When shopping online for your potty training son never google “little boys underpants”. Especially at work. Learn from my sister’s fail.
« Previous Meanwhile on BreastBook… | The Office Politics of Chip Dip Next »
When shopping online for your potty training son never google “little boys underpants”. Especially at work. Learn from my sister’s fail.
That is why you use safe search. I am surprised that your sisters work does not already have it set on all the computers already.
If your sister is the mother of a young child, I can’t imagine anyone who knows this would assume it was anything OTHER than what she meant the search for.
And even without safe search on, I can’t imagine ANY legit search engine would bring back anything pornographic in relation to that search (seeing as it’s illegal in the vast majority of countries).
If the little boys are wearing underwear, it can’t possibly be pornographic…
2 words “Adult Babies” LFSomeone ElsesF please. No I will not go into detail. Rickrolls happen.
According to many laws on child pornography, even if the child is fully clothed, if they are portrayed in a “sexual manner” it is child pornography. Check out the Copine scale.
Safe search or not, doing a search for stuff like that can (and will) raise a few eyebrows from bosses and the local police if they don’t take the time to think it through.
This is what happens when you miss out your apostrophes
you’re apostrophe’s
Unfortunately, Google does not care about punctuation. I’ve had it suggest INCORRECT punctuation to me before. My guess is the incorrect version is searched for more often than the correct one.
Try searching on an actual shopping site instead of everyone’s favorite pron finder.
Really? Target or Wal-Mart, or any similar store if you’re not in the US. Duh?